PRESIDENT
IN CHARGE OF VENEZUELA
Article 232 Provides for two possible scenarios in case of absence of the President.
The first Is that the President had taken office and taken place by the complete absence, in Which case the President of the National Assembly Should be sworn and commissioned the presidency while proceeding to an election by universal, direct and secret within 30 days after the complete Absence have occurred.
The second scenario is there is absolute LACK When being Elected President in office; Whether the fault Occurs Within the first four years of his term, the Vice President of the Republic in charge of the Presidency, while proceeding to the election of the new President in the span of thirty days.
Having Sustained the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court, wrongly in my view, the administrative continuity thesis reelected President, there is another who is the Vice President who is responsible for the Presidency of the Republic, Because if simply accepted as a fact Were That President Chavez took office not all Acts and Decrees That occurred in the period in Which had sworn and take office and the absolute lack, would be null and void, since They Were taken by a usurped authority, Therefore would be void the appointment of Mr. John as Foreign Minister, and the decree of the devaluation of the bolivar and the elimination of Sitme, and all acts, contracts, decisions and resolutions That occurred in That period.
THEREFORE, there is no choice to keep the appearance of legality of actions taken after January 10, to Maintain the thesis That There is an administrative continuity, and so is Mr. Nicolas Maduro, executive vice president, who would handle corresponds the President's Office continued Absence of President Chavez.
Another issue to Consider is who must call an election Within the 30 day period. Among the constitutional functions Assigned to the CNE, not expected anything about it, nor Explicitly That attribution is Given to the President in charge, or the National Assembly, so it is not unreasonable to think That This Could be a matter of constitutional interpretation, and THEREFORE the time to call the elections Could Exceed as normal (but not legal) Within thirty days ordained in the Constitution of Venezuela, yes That delay in convoking the more, the more likely the opposition to win the elections, by accelerating inflation, Lack of foreign
Article 232 Provides for two possible scenarios in case of absence of the President.
The first Is that the President had taken office and taken place by the complete absence, in Which case the President of the National Assembly Should be sworn and commissioned the presidency while proceeding to an election by universal, direct and secret within 30 days after the complete Absence have occurred.
The second scenario is there is absolute LACK When being Elected President in office; Whether the fault Occurs Within the first four years of his term, the Vice President of the Republic in charge of the Presidency, while proceeding to the election of the new President in the span of thirty days.
Having Sustained the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court, wrongly in my view, the administrative continuity thesis reelected President, there is another who is the Vice President who is responsible for the Presidency of the Republic, Because if simply accepted as a fact Were That President Chavez took office not all Acts and Decrees That occurred in the period in Which had sworn and take office and the absolute lack, would be null and void, since They Were taken by a usurped authority, Therefore would be void the appointment of Mr. John as Foreign Minister, and the decree of the devaluation of the bolivar and the elimination of Sitme, and all acts, contracts, decisions and resolutions That occurred in That period.
THEREFORE, there is no choice to keep the appearance of legality of actions taken after January 10, to Maintain the thesis That There is an administrative continuity, and so is Mr. Nicolas Maduro, executive vice president, who would handle corresponds the President's Office continued Absence of President Chavez.
Another issue to Consider is who must call an election Within the 30 day period. Among the constitutional functions Assigned to the CNE, not expected anything about it, nor Explicitly That attribution is Given to the President in charge, or the National Assembly, so it is not unreasonable to think That This Could be a matter of constitutional interpretation, and THEREFORE the time to call the elections Could Exceed as normal (but not legal) Within thirty days ordained in the Constitution of Venezuela, yes That delay in convoking the more, the more likely the opposition to win the elections, by accelerating inflation, Lack of foreign
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario